AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Online photo albums picasa alternative1/17/2024 ![]() ![]() Picasa has gone down the geotagging route, hence the use of the map interface. a street address) to derive the coordinate data for that location. Latitude and Longitude) to an image file’s metadata, while geocoding is the process of using other forms of geographic data (e.g. In short, geotagging is the process of adding coordinate data (i.e. There are two main approaches to handling geographic data: Geotagging and Geocoding. Picasa and WLPG handle geographic metadata in completely different ways, and it’s as well to be aware of the distinction. Now, Google have just released version 3.9 of Picasa, so I took a look at it to see what has changed. That Makernotes corruption bug was acknowledged by Microsoft a year ago, but it is still there in the latest build of WLPG. And once Microsoft had corrected a horrendous geotagging bug in WLPG, I was still left with the fact that WLPG will merrily corrupt Makernotes in Exif metadata if you use it to edit metadata or tag people’s faces. Picasa version 3.8 would not display my geotags correctly, as you can see from the examples I show in this blog post. These are fairly evenly matched in features, but they both suffer from issues such that I do not make much use of them. Up until a couple of days ago, the latest versions meant version 3.8 of Picasa and build. As each new version of Picasa or WLPG has been released, I’ve taken a look at them and blogged about my findings. I first blogged about Picasa back in 2005, when I compared it (favourably) with Microsoft’s Digital Image Library, a product that was subsequently discontinued by Microsoft, and replaced by Windows Live Photo Gallery, which was released in 2007. They have both been around for some years, and have each gone through a number of iterations, adding features each time. Google Photos, instead, is a mobile or web app, with cloud storage.Google’s Picasa and Microsoft’s Windows Live Photo Gallery are free tools for organising, editing and sharing (via the web) collections of photos on your PC. Picasa, on the other hand, displayed all the images at a glance.Īnother critic was that Picasa was a desktop program with cloud storage. One of the common critics has been how slow does Google Photos charge your photos as you browse through the app. Many users struggled to adapt to Google Photos, as Picasa was different. Make sure to check this article to find out more alternatives, as well as the differences between them. Some other alternative apps are Windows and MacOs Photos Gallery, Adobe Lightroom, Photoscape, Dropbox, and Flickr. Google Photos was the recommendation from Google, but the services had some differences (more on that below). Picasa’s users went crazy to find which tool to move on to. As for Picasa Web Albums, it was shut down on 1st May 2016. We believe we can create a much better experience by focusing on one service that provides more functionality and works across mobile and desktop, rather than divide our efforts across two different products."įrom 15th March 2016 onwards, Picasa’s desktop app stopped receiving updates (but it continued to work). "After much thought and consideration, we’ve decided to retire Picasa over the coming months in order to focus entirely on a single photo service in Google Photos. In 2016, Google decided to shut down Picasa and Picasa Web Albums.Īs stated in this article written by Google, the decision to shut down Picasa was part of their efforts to focus on Google Photos, a newer photo-sharing/storage service. Picasa Web Albums was a well-known feature of Picasa that allowed users to share photo albums with friends and family.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |